The Bush administration is at it once again — engaging in a new
public-relations campaign to scare the American
people half to death with the possibility of terrorist attacks with
weapons of mass destruction and to garner support for its invasion
and continued occupation of Iraq, which has not only cost the lives
of thousands of Iraqis and hundreds of Americans but which now has
also become an economic black hole that threatens
the economic security of our nation by sucking hundreds of
billions of dollars out of the pockets of the American people.
Speaking in New Hampshire, President Bush declared, “I was not about to stand by
and wait and trust in the sanity and restraint of Saddam Hussein….
The danger hasn’t passed. The terrorists continue to plot and plan
against our country and our people…. America must not forget the
lessons of September 11.”
Addressing the conservative Heritage Foundation, Vice President Cheney declared that terrorists are
“doing everything they can” to get weapons of mass destruction that
could kill hundreds of thousands of Americans “in a single day of
horror…. Some claim that we should not have acted because the threat
from Saddam Hussein was not imminent. Terrorist enemies of our
country hope to strike us with the most lethal weapons known to man,
and it would be reckless in the extreme to rule out action and save
our worries until the day they strike.”
Speaking to the Council on Foreign Relations, National Security
Advisor Condoleezza Rice declared that Saddam could have
produced weapons of mass destruction “to mount a future attack
beyond the scale of 9/11 — and that terrible prospect could not be
put aside.”
Never mind that no weapons of mass destruction were found in
Iraq, and never mind that Bush has now publicly admitted that Saddam
Hussein had nothing to do with the September 11 attacks. There’s a
much more fundamental problem that the American people ignore at
their peril: It is the U.S. government's morally bankrupt foreign
policy, including its unprovoked and illegal war of aggression
against Iraq, that has produced (and continues to produce) the anger
and hatred that motivates Arabs to commit terrorist acts against the
United States.
After all, let’s not forget that the 9/11 terrorists were
motivated by the stationing of U.S. troops on Islamic holy lands in
Saudi Arabia (which were used to kill innocent Iraqis as part of the
enforcement of the illegally established “no-fly zones” over Iraq),
the cruel and brutal 12-year
embargo against Iraq that contributed to the deaths of hundreds
of thousands of innocent Iraqi children, and the U.S. government’s
unconditional financial and military support of Israeli policies.
Let’s also not forget the anger and hatred that has been
engendered by the U.S. government’s financial and military aid to
cruel and tyrannical regimes, which have brutalized, tortured, and
killed their own people. Does the shah of Iran come to mind? But
it’s also important that we never forget what the Iraqi people will
never forget — that during the 1980s the U.S. government was an
ardent supporter of their cruel and tyrannical dictator, Saddam
Hussein, even furnishing him with weapons of mass destruction,
which, as we all know, U.S. officials are still looking for.
So, Bush’s and Cheney’s use of their so-called war on terrorism
to justify their invasion and continued occupation of Iraq is
patently ludicrous and manifestly deceptive. It was the U.S.
government’s interventionist policies in the Middle East that
engendered the terrorism in the first place. And Bush’s and Cheney’s
invasion and occupation of Iraq are certain to produce even more of
it.
Also, Bush and Cheney cannot be unmindful of the fact that the
more successful they are in scaring the American people with the
prospects of terrorism, especially terrorism with weapons of mass
destruction, the less opposition there will be to government
suppression of civil liberties here at home. After all, it was the
massive fear of mushroom clouds, mustard gas, and Saddam’s other
weapons of mass destruction that Bush and Cheney planted in the
hearts and minds of the American people that won them the necessary
public support to attack and invade a sovereign and independent
country that had never attacked the United States and to do so
without the constitutionally required declaration of war.
It was also that mind-numbing fear that enabled U.S. officials —
whose policies engendered the terrorist attacks in the first place
and whose gross negligence failed to anticipate the attacks — to
implement the most massive centralization of federal power and the
most dangerous assault on the constitutional guarantees and civil
liberties of the American people in our lifetime.
Here’s the big picture regarding the relationship between the
U.S. government’s morally bankrupt foreign policy and terrorism
against America, a picture that unfortunately both Bush and Cheney
studiously avoid in their renewed public plea for support for both
their “war on terrorism” and their invasion and occupation of Iraq:
1. Throughout the 1970s, the U.S. government supports the shah of
Iran and helps him to brutalize, torture, and kill his own people.
In anger and hatred, the people of Iran revolt and oust the shah
from power, replacing him with an Islamic fundamentalist who refuses
to do the bidding of the U.S. government.
2. In retaliation, the Reagan-Bush administration in the 1980s
supports Saddam Hussein and authorizes the
delivery to him of biological and chemical weapons, which he
uses against the Iranian people with the full support of U.S. officials.
3. When Saddam Hussein signals to U.S. Ambassador April Glaspie
in 1991 that he intends to invade Kuwait, she inexplicably gives him
a green light by indicating that such disputes are no concern of the
United States. When Saddam invades Kuwait, the U.S. government turns
on him and intervenes in the Persian Gulf War to reverse the
invasion.
4. After reversing the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, the U.S.
government, under President George H.W. Bush, leaves Saddam Hussein
in power. Promising the Iraqi people support and assistance, U.S.
officials induce them to revolt against Saddam and then double-cross
them by standing by as Saddam massacres them and fills mass graves
with them.
5. U.S. officials then initiate their 12-year campaign to
convince the American people that Saddam Hussein (with whom they
previously had had a
cozy relationship) was the most dangerous person in
the world and implement their 12-year
embargo against Iraq with the purpose of squeezing the Iraqi
people into ousting Saddam from power. The embargo contributes to
the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children. U.S.
Ambassador to the United Nations (and later Secretary of State)
Madeleine Albright expresses the unbelievably callous sentiments of
U.S. officials when she tells 60 Minutes that the deaths of the
Iraqi children have been “worth it,” a statement that quickly
reverberates within the Arab community all over the Middle East.
6. U.S. officials station U.S. soldiers, who are oftentimes
obsessively preoccupied with sex and booze, in Saudi Arabia, where
the lands that are considered the most holy in the Islamic religion
— Mecca and Medina — are located. It is an action that U.S.
officials know is certain to produce tremendous anger and resentment
among Muslims. Those bases are then used to enforce unilaterally
established (i.e., established without support of the UN) “no-fly
zones” over Iraq, with bombs and missiles that kill innocent
Iraqis, including children, without any remorse whatsoever among
U.S. officials.
7. And of course we can’t ignore the U.S. government’s long-held
policy of unconditional financial and military support of the
Israeli government, without respect to whether its actions are right
or wrong, a policy that has never ceased to engender anger and
hatred among the Arab community.
Ask yourself these important questions: Can you think of a more
perfect prescription for terrorism against the United States than
all that? How could anyone be surprised that the victims — or
friends and relatives of the victims — would ultimately retaliate?
That’s why it is amazing that U.S. officials were so surprised by
the September 11 attacks. After all, being surprised by the 1993
terrorist attack on the World Trade Center, the 1998 terrorist
attacks on U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, and the 2000
terrorist attack on the USS Cole in Yemen, is one thing. But being
surprised by the 2001 terrorist attack on the WTC is quite another,
especially since it came after a cruel and brutal foreign policy
that contributed to the deaths of multitudes of innocent people
throughout the intervening period of time and after multiple
terrorist responses to that policy.
The American people are now faced with a big choice: Should we
continue to believe the falsehoods, exaggerations, and deceptions of
those who have led our nation down a road that has produced massive
amounts of death and destruction — a road of empire, intervention,
and dominion over the lives and fortunes of people all over the
world — a road that now threatens the economic security of the American people through the
uncontrolled federal spending that is necessary to finance it — a
road that will inevitably produce more animosity and hatred against
our nation, which in turn will produce more terrorism against the
United States, which in turn will produce more government oppression
here at home?
Or has the time come to reestablish the constitutional republic
that our Founders and ancestors intended for us — a republic that
would restore peace, prosperity, and harmony to our lives and once
again make America the most admired and respected country in the
world?
Mr. Hornberger is founder and president of The Future of
Freedom Foundation. Send him email.