Condoleezza Rice's Credibility Gap
A point-by-point analysis of how one of America's top national security officials has a severe problem with the truth
03/23/04 "Center for American Progress"
- CLAIM: "I don't think anybody could have predicted
that they would try to use an airplane as a missile, a hijacked
airplane as a missile." – National Security Adviser
Condoleezza Rice, 5/16/02
- FACT: On August 6, 2001, the President personally
"received a one-and-a-half page briefing advising him that
Osama bin Laden was capable of a major strike against the US, and
that the plot could include the hijacking of an American
airplane." In July 2001, the Administration was also told that
terrorists had explored using airplanes as missiles. [Source: NBC,
9/10/02; LA Times, 9/27/01]
- CLAIM: In May 2002, Rice held a press conference to defend
the Administration from new revelations that the President had been
explicitly warned about an al Qaeda threat to airlines in August
2001. She "suggested that Bush had requested the briefing
because of his keen concern about elevated terrorist threat levels
that summer." [Source: Washington Post, 3/25/04]
- FACT: According to the CIA, the briefing "was not
requested by President Bush." As commissioner Richard Ben-Veniste
disclosed, "the CIA informed the panel that the author of the
briefing does not recall such a request from Bush and that the idea
to compile the briefing came from within the CIA." [Source:
Washington Post, 3/25/04]
- CLAIM: "In June and July when the threat spikes were
so high…we were at battle stations." – National Security
Adviser Condoleezza Rice, 3/22/04
- FACT: "Documents indicate that before Sept. 11,
Ashcroft did not give terrorism top billing in his strategic plans
for the Justice Department, which includes the FBI. A draft of
Ashcroft's 'Strategic Plan' from Aug. 9, 2001, does not put fighting
terrorism as one of the department's seven goals, ranking it as a
sub-goal beneath gun violence and drugs. By contrast, in April 2000,
Ashcroft's predecessor, Janet Reno, called terrorism 'the most
challenging threat in the criminal justice area.'" Meanwhile,
the Bush Administration decided to terminate "a highly
classified program to monitor Al Qaeda suspects in the United
States." [Source: Washington Post, 3/22/04;
Newsweek, 3/21/04]
- CLAIM: "The fact of the matter is [that] the
administration focused on this before 9/11." – National
Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, 3/22/04
- FACT: President Bush and Vice President Cheney's
counterterrorism task force, which was created in May, never
convened one single meeting. The President himself admitted that
"I didn't feel the sense of urgency" about terrorism
before 9/11. [Source: Washington Post, 1/20/02;
Bob Woodward's "Bush at War"]
- CLAIM: "Our [pre-9/11 NSPD] plan called for military
options to attack al Qaeda and Taliban leadership, ground forces and
other targets -- taking the fight to the enemy where he lived."
– National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, 3/22/04
- FACT: 9/11 Commissioner Gorelick: "There is
nothing in the NSPD that came out that we could find that had an
invasion plan, a military plan." Deputy Secretary of State
Richard Armitage: "Right." Gorelick: "Is it true, as
Dr. Rice said, 'Our plan called for military options to attack Al
Qaida and Taliban leadership'?" Armitage: "No, I think
that was amended after the horror of 9/11." [Source: 9/11
Commission testimony, 3/24/04]
Condi Rice on Pre-9/11 Counterterrorism
Funding
- CLAIM: "The president increased counterterrorism
funding several-fold" before 9/11. – National Security
Adviser Condoleezza Rice, 3/24/04
- FACT: According to internal government documents, the first
full Bush budget for FY2003 "did not endorse F.B.I. requests
for $58 million for 149 new counterterrorism field agents, 200
intelligence analysts and 54 additional translators" and
"proposed a $65 million cut for the program that gives state
and local counterterrorism grants." Newsweek noted the
Administration "vetoed a request to divert $800 million from
missile defense into counterterrorism." [Source: New York
Times, 2/28/04;
Newsweek, 5/27/02]
Richard Clarke's Concerns
- CLAIM: "Richard Clarke had plenty of opportunities to
tell us in the administration that he thought the war on terrorism
was moving in the wrong direction and he chose not to." –
National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, 3/22/04
- FACT: Clarke sent a memo to Rice principals on 1/24/01
marked "urgent" asking for a Cabinet-level meeting to deal
with an impending al Qaeda attack. The White House acknowledges
this, but says "principals did not need to have a formal
meeting to discuss the threat." No meeting occurred until one
week before 9/11. [Source: CBS 60 Minutes, 3/24/04;
White House Press Release, 3/21/04
- CLAIM: "No al Qaeda plan was turned over to the new
administration." – National Security Adviser Condoleezza
Rice, 3/22/04
- FACT: "On January 25th, 2001, Clarke forwarded his
December 2000 strategy paper and a copy of his 1998 Delenda plan to
the new national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice." – 9/11
Commission staff report, 3/24/04
Response to 9/11
- CLAIM: "The president launched an aggressive response
after 9/11." – National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice,
3/22/04
- FACT: "In the early days after the Sept. 11, 2001,
attacks, the Bush White House cut by nearly two-thirds an emergency
request for counterterrorism funds by the FBI, an internal
administration budget document shows. The papers show that Ashcroft
ranked counterterrorism efforts as a lower priority than his
predecessor did, and that he resisted FBI requests for more
counterterrorism funding before and immediately after the
attacks." [Source: Washington Post, 3/22/04]
9/11 and Iraq Invasion Plans
- CLAIM: "Not a single National Security Council
principal at that meeting recommended to the president going after
Iraq. The president thought about it. The next day he told me Iraq
is to the side." – National Security Adviser Condoleezza
Rice, 3/22/04
- FACT: According to the Washington Post, "six days
after the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon,
President Bush signed a 2-and-a-half-page document marked 'TOP
SECRET'" that "directed the Pentagon to begin planning
military options for an invasion of Iraq." This is corroborated
by a CBS News, which reported on 9/4/02 that five hours after
the 9/11 attacks, "Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld was
telling his aides to come up with plans for striking Iraq."
[Source: Washington Post, 1/12/03.
CBS News, 9/4/02]
Iraq and WMD
- CLAIM: "It's not as if anybody believes that Saddam
Hussein was without weapons of mass destruction." – National
Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, 3/18/04
- FACT: The Bush Administration's top weapons inspector David
Kay "resigned his post in January, saying he did not believe
banned stockpiles existed before the invasion" and has urged
the Bush Administration to "come clean" about misleading
America about the WMD threat. [Source: Chicago Tribune, 3/24/04;
UK Guardian, 3/3/04]
9/11-al Qaeda-Iraq Link
- CLAIM: "The president returned to the White House and
called me in and said, I've learned from George Tenet that there is
no evidence of a link between Saddam Hussein and 9/11." –
National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, 3/22/04
- FACT: If this is true, then why did the President and Vice
President repeatedly claim Saddam Hussein was directly connected to
9/11? President Bush sent a letter to Congress on 3/19/03 saying
that the Iraq war was permitted specifically under legislation that
authorized force against "nations, organizations, or persons
who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks
that occurred on September 11." Similarly, Vice President
Cheney said on 9/14/03 that "It is not surprising that people
make that connection" between Iraq and the 9/11 attacks, and
said "we don't know" if there is a connection. [Source:
BBC, 9/14/03]
© Center for American Progress
Join our Daily News Headlines
Email Digest
|
|
Information
Clearing House
Daily News Headlines
Digest
|
HOME
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
|